As mentioned earlier, one of the hallmarks of Ideal College Football is balanced scheduling. So, what exactly is balanced scheduling? In this case, it means that teams will be playing other teams at their level, i.e. good teams play good teams, average teams play average teams and bad teams play bad teams – with a little crossover. Let's get into a bit of specifics on this point.
First, let’s establish how many nonconference games a team will play in a given season, and the answer is seven…for most schools. Some schools will play eight nonconference games (and a handful will play nine), depending on the number of teams per conference and the conferences they’re matched up with. Schools in 10-team conferences tend to play more nonconference games, in order to fulfill the scheduling requirements of the larger conferences. In general, teams play four group games, two division games and one non-division game. This is in addition to their full conference slate, of course. Conferences contain between 10-12 schools, so every school is going to play a regular season of 16-18 games in Ideal College Football.
You’ll notice that there are three conferences per group. Every team plays two other teams from each of the other conferences in their group, one high seed and one low seed, or two middle seeds if the team in question is a middle seed. Capeesh? Every team also plays one team from one conference in each of the other groups in its division. Finally, every team will play a game from a conference in a completely different division. Let’s use an example: the SEC. The SEC is in Division 1 Group I, so every member school in the SEC will play two games each against the SWC and ACC. The SEC is matched up with the Big 10 from Group II, so there will be single match-ups between these conferences; and with the American South from Group III, also creating single match-ups. Finally, the SEC’s non-division games are against the Sun Belt (Division 2, Group IV), creating a final single match-up. This will all become more clear when we begin play. So, let’s look at the division crossovers:
The first portion of the above equations refer to Ideal College Football; the latter portion to NCAA/NAIA designations.
One note about the seeding for this initial season of Ideal College Football: While doing the extensive research in putting this together, I decided to look at programs long-term. Therefore, teams are seeded where you would expect them to be within conferences, though perhaps not exactly where they would be if we were only looking at this past season. Some programs have fallen behind where we traditionally expect them to be (ex. Nebraska, Miami), while other programs are recently emerging from decades of obscurity (ex. Baylor, TCU). Programs in Ideal College Football are not going to be exactly where they were from the most recent NCAA/NAIA season exclusively; nor are they going to be as they were five or 10 years ago exclusively; they are going to be an amalgamation of many seasons. As I put this together, it became apparent that this is the approach that would work best. These teams are going to perform as you would expect them to perform long-term, yet perhaps not exactly as they were during the most recently-completed season. Surprises are undoubtedly in store. As with any aspect of ICFB, I welcome your questions: firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter or Facebook.
IDEAL COLLEGE FOOTBALL
Copyright © Steven Sugarman